A nonzero element \(r\) of a ring \(R\) is said to be a left \(0\)-divisor if there exists a nonzero element \(s\in R\) such that \(rs=0\text{.}\)
Right \(0\)-divisors are defined similarly.
Remark1.3.2.
A left \(0\)-divisor need not be a right \(0\)-divisor. For instance, consider a triangular ring given in Example 1.2.7 with \(A=\Z/2\Z\text{.}\) We denote the additive identity in the ring \(\Z/2\Z\) by \([0]\text{.}\) Verify that the following element is a left \(0\)-divisor but not a right \(0\)-divisor.
An element \(r\) of a ring \(R\) said to be nilpotent if there exists a natural number \(n\) such that \(r^n=0\) in \(R\text{.}\)
Definition1.3.4.(Idempotent Elements and Orthogonal Idempotents).
An element \(r\) of a ring \(R\) said to be idempotent if \(r^2=r\) in \(R\text{.}\)
Idempotents \(0,1\) of a ring \(R\) are called the trivial idempotents.
Idempotents \(\{e_i\}_{i\in I}\) are called orthogonal if \(e_ie_j=0=e_je_i\) for every \(i\neq j\text{.}\)
Definition1.3.5.(Left and right invertible elements).
Let \(R\) be a ring. A nonzero element \(r\in R\) is said to be left invertible (resp., right invertible) if there exists \(s\in R\) (resp., \(s^\prime\in R\)) such that \(sr=1\) (resp., \(rs^\prime=1\)), and we call \(s\) (resp., \(s^\prime\)) to be a left inverse (resp., a right inverse) of \(r\text{.}\)
Lemma1.3.6.
Let \(R\) be a ring, and \(0\neq r\in R\text{.}\) If \(s\) is a left inverse of \(r\) and \(t\) is a right inverse of \(r\) then \(s=t\text{.}\)
We have \(sr=1\) and \(rt=1\text{.}\) Multiplying \(sr=1\) on right by \(t\) gives \((sr)t=t\text{.}\) Associativity of multiplication and \(rt=1\) implies that \(s=t\text{.}\)
Convention1.3.7.
Suppose that \(0\neq r\in R\) has both left and right inverse, say \(s\) and \(t\text{,}\) respectively. We denote \(s=t=r^{-1}\) and \(r^{-1}\) is called the inverse of \(r\text{.}\) Thus, \(r^{-1}r=1=rr^{-1}\text{.}\) The use of an article ‘the’ before the term inverse is justified in the following Lemma 1.3.8.
Lemma1.3.8.(Uniqueness of inverse).
If inverse of a nonzero element of a ring exists then it is unique.
Suppose that \(s\) and \(t\) are two inverses of a nonzero element \(r\) of a ring \(R\text{,}\) i.e., \(sr=1=rs\) and \(rt=1=tr\text{.}\) Thus, \((s-t)r=sr-tr=0\) this implies that \((s-t)rt=0\cdot t\) i.e., \(s-t=0\text{.}\)
Definition1.3.9.(Invertible element).
A nonzero element \(r\in R\) is said to be invertible in \(R\) or a unit in \(R\) if inverse of \(r\) exists in \(R\text{.}\) The inverse of \(r\) is denoted by \(r^{-1}\text{.}\)